Add Products to the Cart to Obtain Instant Discounts!

Fundamental cooling tower issue

January 05, 2017 0 Comments

Fundamental cooling tower issue

A company operates a three-cell cooling tower system that was having

problems maintaining conductivity. The cooling tower had two possible

makeup water sources. The primary makeup source was tertiary RO water

from wastewater treatment at 175 microS. The secondary makeup source was

well water at 480 microS. The operators noticed that when the tower is running

on well water, they were able to maintain the proper conductivity of 1,700

microS in the cooling tower, but when the tower is running on RO water, they are

only able to maintain a conductivity of 700 microS even with the blowdown

valve completely closed. What was happening?


Before you continue with

this article, look at the figure below and take the time to consider what

could explain this.


Why was the cooling tower unable to maintain the conductivity setpoint on

RO water but could on well water?


Faulty Conductivity Control?

The conductivity controller was able to properly maintain conductivity on

well water. The conductivity controller was working fine.


Blowdown Valve Leaking?

There was an air gap between the blowdown line and the drain. The

blowdown valve was not leaking past.


Uncontrolled Water Loss?

The answer was that there was an uncontrolled water loss somewhere. This

water loss was bigger than blowdown required when the cooling tower was on

RO water makeup, but smaller than the blowdown required on well water.


Was It Drift or a Leak?

We inspected the cooling tower and saw no drift or overflow from the tower

that would explain this sudden change in operation. There must have been a

leak, but how big of a leak? Using the cooling tower operational parameters, we

calculated just how big the leak was.


Operational Parameters

Recirculation Rate: 11,227 gpm

ΔT: 10 °F

Evaporative Cooling: 90% (tropical climate)

Conductivity Setpoint: 1,700 microS

RO Makeup Conductivity: 175 microS

Well Makeup Conductivity: 480 microS

The evaporation rate was:

Evap = 11,227 * 10 * 0.9 / 1000 = 101 gpm

Under normal operation, the cooling tower cycles would have been:

Well Cycles = 1700/480 = 3.54

RO Cycles = 1700/175 = 9.71

The cycles they were currently running on RO water was:

RO Cycles Current = 700/175 = 4

The amount of blowdown required under normal operation was:


Cooling Towers 222

BDWell = 101 / (3.54 - 1) = 39.8 gpm

BDRO = 101 / (9.71 - 1) = 11.6 gpm


The blowdown required when they currently ran on RO water was:

BDCurrent RO = 101 / (4 - 1) = 33.4 gpm


Notice that this number is smaller than the blowdown required for well water

but much higher than the blowdown required for RO water under normal

operation conditions. This clearly shows why the cooling tower could

maintain the conductivity setpoint on well water but not on RO water.

Since the blowdown valve was completely closed when they were currently

running on RO water, this meant that there was a 33.4 gpm leak somewhere.

A sizeable leak indeed!


Finding the Leak

The cooling tower system was used to cool several rather complicated

processes with many heat exchangers, so finding the leak was not going to be

simple. I had to leave the facility before the leak was found, but the water

management associate in charge had planned to question the operators in the

area for possible leaks. If this didn't work, red dye was going to be added to help

track the leak down.

Also in Blog

Revolutionizing Water Analysis: Everything You Need to Know About the Kemio KEM10DIS
Revolutionizing Water Analysis: Everything You Need to Know About the Kemio KEM10DIS

April 19, 2023 0 Comments

The Palintest Kemio KEM10DIS is a highly accurate, fast, and easy-to-use water analysis device that offers several advantages over other methods. Its portability and wide measurement range make it ideal for use in a range of applications, from drinking water to industrial process water. With its patented Dual-Field technology and fast results, the Palintest Kemio KEM10DIS can help to improve the efficiency of water treatment processes and reduce the risk of contamination. Compared to other methods, the device is highly accurate and easy to use, making it accessible to a wide range of users. By following the simple procedure outlined above, users can quickly and easily obtain accurate results for a range of parameters, helping to ensure the safety and quality of water for various applications.

View full article →

Optimizing Cooling Tower Performance with Conductivity Controllers
Optimizing Cooling Tower Performance with Conductivity Controllers

April 17, 2023 0 Comments

Cooling towers play a critical role in industrial processes, but issues such as scaling, corrosion, and microbiological growth can cause reduced efficiency, increased maintenance costs, and even equipment failure. Fortunately, conductivity controllers like the Lakewood Instruments 1575e can help optimize cooling tower performance. A case study found that after installing the controller, a manufacturing facility was able to significantly improve the tower's performance by reducing water consumption by over 20% and saving over $10,000 per year on chemical usage. Additionally, the facility was able to reduce its environmental footprint. Overall, conductivity controllers are a worthwhile investment for any facility with a cooling tower, as they can lead to significant cost savings and environmental benefits.

View full article →

Cooling tower
Avoid this issues when starting a cooling tower

March 20, 2023 0 Comments

Conductivity controllers are critical devices in cooling tower systems, but they can develop issues when the tower has been dry for several months.

View full article →